Casino Nixed, Housing Proposed—Here’s Why That Matters
- Serj Markarian
- 5 hours ago
- 2 min read


In a significant turn of events, Wynn Resorts and Related Companies have officially withdrawn their $12 billion proposal to build a casino at Hudson Yards, citing persistent community opposition and the complexities of rezoning the site. This move marks a turning point in New York City’s casino race and underscores the challenges of introducing large-scale entertainment venues into densely developed residential areas.
Â
While the proposed casino promised economic benefits such as job creation, tourism, and new infrastructure, it also raised serious concerns from residents and urban advocates. Critics pointed to potential spikes in traffic, noise, and crime—as well as the disruption it could cause to the neighborhood’s character and nearby landmarks like the High Line. Many viewed the project as more of a burden than a benefit.
Â
In response to public pushback, Related has pivoted to a new vision: a residential development that would include 4,000 housing units—some of them affordable—plus a 5.6-acre public park. For a city in desperate need of more housing, this proposal feels more aligned with long-term community priorities than a luxury gaming resort.
Â
For residential buyers and sellers, this shift is worth noting. New development in Hudson Yards could relieve some supply-side pressure in the Manhattan market while enhancing neighborhood appeal through added green space and infrastructure. It’s a reminder that in NYC real estate, neighborhood character and livability remain just as influential as flashy commercial ventures.
Â
Some of you may recall that we explored the pros and cons of a NYC casino a few years ago, when the idea was first gaining traction.Much has changed since then—but the conversation about what kind of growth serves the city best is more relevant than ever.
Â
Have a safe and restful Memorial Day weekend ahead.